THMMY.gr

Occam's Razor asks us which explanation makes the least number of assumptions. The explanation which makes the least number of assumptions is the simplest explanation. Occam's Razor works in favor of the Flat Earth Theory. Several examples exist below.

What's the simplest explanation; that my experience of existing upon a plane wherever I go and whatever I do is a massive illusion, that my eyes are constantly deceiving me and that I am actually looking at the enormous sphere of the earth spinning through space at tens of thousands of miles an hour, whirling in perpetual epicycles around the universe; or is the simplest explanation that my eyes are not playing tricks on me and that the earth is exactly as it appears?

What's the simplest explanation; that NASA has successfully designed and invented never before seen rocket technologies from scratch which can accelerate 100 tons of matter straight up at 7 miles per second, and that NASA can do the impossible on a daily basis, explore the cosmos, and constantly wow the nation by landing a man on the moon and sending robots to mars; or is the simplest explanation that they really can't do all of that stuff?

When I walk off the edge of a chair and go into free fall while observing the surface of the earth carefully the earth appears to accelerate up towards me. What's the simplest explanation; that there exists hypothetical undiscovered Graviton particles emanating from the earth which allows them to accelerate my body towards the surface through unexplained quantum effects; or is the simplest explanation that this mysterious highly theoretical mechanism does not exist and the earth has just accelerated upwards towards me exactly as I've observed?

What's the simplest explanation; that when I look up and see the sun slowly move across the sky over the course of the day, that the globe earth is spinning at over a thousand miles per hour - faster than the speed of sound at the equator - despite me being unable able to feel this centripetal acceleration, or is the simplest explanation that the sun itself is just moving across the sky exactly as I have observed?

What's the simplest explanation; that the sun, moon, and stars are enormous bodies of unimaginable mass, size, and distances which represent frontiers to a vast and infinite unknowable universe teeming with alien worlds, galactic civilizations, black holes, novas and nebulae, and phenomena only conceivable in science fiction; or is the simplest explanation that the universe isn't so large or unknown and when we look up at the stars we are just looking at small points of light exactly they appear to be?


http://theflatearthsociety.org/cms/
http://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/

Σε μια εποχή όπου καταιγιζόμαστε από πληροφορίες, είναι επόμενο να θέλεις ένα διάλειμμα και να θέλεις να βλέπεις μόνο με τα δικά σου μάτια.

Από εκεί και πέρα, η ανάλυση του θέματος είναι καθαρά θέμα επιλογής του σημείου αναφοράς. Η αρχή αυτής της επιλογής είναι η διαφορά της μιας παρατήρησης από την άλλη. Τα δυο μας μάτια μαζί βλέπουν διαφορετικά απ'ότι το ένα μόνο του. Όταν είσαι έξω από το τρένο βλέπεις ττο τρένο διαφορετικό απ'όταν είσαι μέσα και αυτό κινείται, κλπ.

κάποιος μας τρολλαρει

nai re.
i nasa.

O Μεσαίωνας δεν συνέβη ποτέ.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phantom_time_hypothesis

και μιλάμε... υπάρχουν στοιχεία!

Elpizw na mh xreiazetai pragmatika na exhghsw giati h epixeirhmatologia tou prwtou post den eusta8ei.

pes
pes.

Δεν ευσταθει, γιατι συμφωνα με το Occam's razor ισχυει η απλουστερη υποθεση με βαση τα δεδομενα που υπαρχουν. Αν εχεις φωτογραφιες με την γη να ειναι σφαιρικη, αλλα εσυ επιμενεις οτι ειναι επιπεδη απλα επειδη τοσο φτανει το ματι σου, απλα αμφισβητεις τα δεδομενα, δεν εφαρμοζεις την λογικη του Occam's razor.

Τωρα, αν οντως η προθεση ειναι να αμφισβητησεις τα δεδομενα ειναι ενα αλλο θεμα, και υπαρχουν αντιστοιχα site με θεωριες περι κουφαλας γης κτλ κτλ

http://frikipaideia.wikia.com/wiki/%CE%95%CF%80%CE%AF%CF%80%CE%B5%CE%B4%CE%B7_%CE%93%CE%B7

καποιος δεν άντεξε :P

Ε μα ...